AGBU Magazine |April 2008

Armenia in Turmoil

THE OTHER SARKISIAN: DOES APPOINTMENT OF NEW PREMIER SIGNAL COOPERATION?

by Marianna Grigoryan Days after President Serge Sargsyan nominated Central Bank chairman Tigran Sarkisian (no relation) as his prime minister, commentary among analysts and politicians in Yerevan turned from who had been chosen to how the decision had been made. Tigran Sarkisian, 48, has no political party membership and maintains that he will remain unaffiliated while serving a government overwhelmingly controlled by the president's Republican Party of Armenia (RPA).

SPRING OF DISCONTENT: CAN PUTTING DOWN A MOVEMENT MEAN MOVING ARMENIA FORWARD?

by John Hughes Inauguration Day came to Armenia April 9 with skies full of brilliance and spectacle over the capital, Yerevan. Like something from a fairy tale for most here who had never witnessed such a thing, 18 hot air balloons carrying waving passengers in straw baskets floated their way across the city as if the sky had opened into a bag of giant M&Ms.

REPERCUSSIONS: THE OUTLOOK FOR SECURITY AND STABILITY IN KARABAKH

by Richard Giragosian While Armenia was gripped by a series of demonstrations and protests in the wake of its February 19 presidential election, Karabakh seemed a far-away concern for most Armenians. But while Armenia's capital was under an internal siege of its own in early March, the turmoil created an opportunity that resulted in an outbreak of hostilities, which sparked renewed concern over the security and stability of Karabakh.

POST-ELECTION MONEY MATTERS: ECONOMY WILL PULL ITSELF UP QUICKLY, TOP BRASS PROMISE

by Suren Musayelyan and Sara Khojoyan Political upheavals never do good to an economy, an axiom that Armenia's authorities may have already felt in some way in the wake of the post-election political crisis, and surely will have to deal with in the months or even years to come. Armenia, which has seen six straight years of double-digit economic growth and was, according to all projections, well on track for another year of robust growth in 2008, is facing a prospect of possible economic slowdown on the heels of this spring's troubled post-election developments.

MARCH 1 AND THE MEDIA: PROSPECTS FOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM STILL DARK AFTER EMERGENCY BLACKOUT

by Leah Kohlenberg Early on Saturday morning, March 1, as police prepared to storm sleeping protesters camped in front of Yerevan's opera house, 300 kilometers away near the Iranian border, Samvel Alexanian, editor of Kapan's local newspaper, noticed that his regular edition had not been delivered to kiosks as normal.

GALA PERFORMANCE FOR GALA TV: FUNDRAISER RESCUES INDEPENDENT TV CHANNEL

by Ani Hakobyan A new kind of civic action in Armenia grew out of the turmoil of March 1, with the viewer-supported rescue of a Gyumri television station. March 17-25, supporters of GALA TV—schoolchildren to pensioners to human rights advocates to unknown fans abroad—rallied to "loan" the station 26,458,500 drams ($88,195) to keep it on air and out of trouble with Armenia's tax collectors. The action is the first of its kind in Armenia—similar to the popular worldwide telethon held in support of the Armenia Fund each November and broadcast from cities abroad.

FIX IT: OUTSIDE AGENCIES CALL ON ARMENIA TO UNDO THE DAMAGE OF A BRUTAL SPRING

by John Hughes As Armenia struggles yet to secure her place on the international map of importance and relevance, the 33 days from February 19 to March 22 sent a redundant message to the outside world that she remains a troubled teenaged republic. Even before Election Day, some allies were not happy with how the campaign process was being conducted.

DOUR DEMOCRATS

by Lincoln A. Mitchell Presidential races in Georgia, Armenia and Russia were not just bumps on the road to democracy, and that's a big problem for democracy advocates. Georgia, Russia and Armenia have all held presidential elections this year, and in each case, the outcomes demonstrate that efforts to strengthen democracy are either stagnant or, more worryingly, failing. In Russia, we saw a well-orchestrated and smoothly run undemocratic election, and there was little democracy advocates or international observers could have done to change that.